Citigroup — free report for Ask Matt, Dangerous Rating

Here is our free report on Citi.

See my recent post Mayo Is Right about Citi for details on our analy­sis of the company’s loose Deferred Tax account­ing and other Red Flags. There are other rea­sons (besides ques­tion­able account­ing for deferred tax assets) to run from this stock.

RED FLAGS:

  1. Over $7bn in off-balance sheet debt
  2. $2.2bn in under-funded Pen­sion liabilities
  3. Over $10bn in Asset write-offs
  4. Very Dan­ger­ous val­u­a­tion (detail follow)

Our dis­counted cash flows analy­sis reveals another RED FLAG — a Very Dan­ger­ous Val­u­a­tion. At $3.67, Citi’s stock price implies the com­pany will grow its NOPAT (Net Oper­at­ing Prof­its After Tax) by over 15% per year for each of the next 25 years. In other words, to jus­tify the cur­rent val­u­a­tion of its stock, Citi has to grow its NOPAT by 15% com pounded annu­ally for 25 years. As explained in , Citi’s per­for­mance must mean­ing fully exceed the cur­rent expec­ta­tions of a 15% CAGR for NOPAT over 25 years in order for (long) investors to make money in the stock.

All the details are in our free report on Citi. For the asset write-offs and their impact on eco­nomic earn­ings see Appen­dix 3 in our report. Our Risk/Reward rat ing is on page 1.

See Appen­dix 4 to learn how  we cal­cu­late NOPAT and NOPAT Mar­gin. See Appen­dix 5 for details on how JDSU’s Invested Cap­i­tal is bloated due to the asset write-offs and the large deferred tax asset. Appen­dix 7 (in the Return on Invested Cap­i­tal sec tion) shows how a ris­ing NOPAT Mar­gin and ris­ing Invested Cap­i­tal Turns result in a jump in ROIC (to .6%) and neg­a­tive Eco­nomic Profit of -$41.2bn while Net Income is nega­tive $9.2bn — dur­ing the last fiscal year.

As per  and , C fits the pro­file of a good stock to sell.

**See  and Eco­nomic Ver­sus Account­ing Prof­its for more details on why account ing prof its are not reli able indi ca tors of cor po rate prof itabil ity or value creation.

2 Comments

  1. Herb
    Posted September 3, 2010 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think you con­sider the vast fran­chise reach of this finan­cial insti­tu­tion, which is sec­ond to none in terms of num­ber of branches and coun­try pres­ence world­wide. There isn’t another bank which comes even close. I believe the 15% NOPAT addressed in your analy­sis will be sur­passed once the finan­cial cri­sis is behind us. This may take a cou­ple of years but we will see it.

  2. Posted September 7, 2010 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    Herb:
    Thank you for your com­ment.
    My point about the val­u­a­tion of the stock is that 15% CAGR in NOPAT for 20 years is the cur­rent level of expec­ta­tions in the stock price. For investors to make money in Citi shares, the com­pany will have to pro­duce sub­stan­tially more prof­its that what already embed­ded in the stock. Even if the fran­chise value is as good as you sug­gest, the stock mar­ket seems to have already taken that into account and priced the stock accord­ingly. Given the RED FLAGS (includ­ing the already-high expec­ta­tions), the stock has more down­side risk than upside poten­tial. I pre­fer to buy stocks with low expec­ta­tions and sell them when expec­ta­tions get high, like the expec­ta­tions in Citi’s price.

    See this blog post for more info on the “Buy low expec­ta­tions and sell high expec­ta­tions” invest­ment strategy.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*