Sign Up For The Next
New Constructs Webinar


How To Avoid the Worst Sector ETFs

Tuesday, December 18th, 2012 WorstSectorETF_Fig1

Why are there so many ETFs? The answer is: because ETF providers are making lots of money selling them. The number of ETFs has little to do with serving investors’ best interests. Here are three red flags investors can use to avoid the worst ETFs…

Read More

Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Information Technology Sector

Thursday, July 12th, 2012 InfoTech1

The Information Technology sector ranks second out of the ten sectors as detailed in my sector roadmap. It gets my Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 27 ETFs and 137 mutual funds in the Information Technology sector as of July 11, 2012.

Read More

Picking The Diamonds Out of The ETF Rough

Friday, October 7th, 2011 Figure1

Having too many choices can be intimidating. And there are definitely lots of choices when it comes to ETFs. For example, in the equity market alone, there 30+ technology sector ETFs, or 35 ‘large cap value’ and 20 financial ETFs. A very healthy selection abounds for every category of ETF.
The problem is that these ETFs are not made the same even though they may be in the same category. There are major differences in methodologies between funds, which results in drastically different holdings even within a given sector. See Figure 1.

Read More

Tech Sector ETF Rankings for 3Q11

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011 Figure2_tech

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) is our top pick among the 25 ETFs we analyzed for our 3Q11 update on the “Best & Worst Tech Sector ETFs”.

Read More

3Q11 Sector ETF Rankings: Chips and Dips Rise To The Top

Friday, July 15th, 2011 dreamstimefree_310726_upGraph

The consumer staples and information technology sectors are tops among the ten major sectors. Both get our “attractive” rating. Our Sector Roadmap report ranks and rates all of the 10 sectors. It also benchmarks all sectors against the S&P 500, which gets our “neutral” rating and the Russell 2000, which gets our “dangerous” rating.

Read More